Skip navigation
How Windows Server 2012 Eases the Pain of Kerberos Constrained Delegation, Part 1

How Windows Server 2012 Eases the Pain of Kerberos Constrained Delegation, Part 1

A new kind of Kerberos constrained delegation addresses shortcomings

Let’s talk authentication—specifically, Kerberos constrained delegation. But first, if you're new to Kerberos or need a quick refresher, I would suggest that you read the Ask the Directory Services Team blog posts “Kerberos for the Busy Admin” and “Understanding Kerberos Double Hop” to get up to speed on the terminology and concepts contained throughout this article. Part 1 of this article describes the benefits of using Kerberos constrained delegation with Windows Server 2012 over earlier versions of Windows Server. Part 2 will provide a technical walkthrough of how Kerberos constrained delegation works in Server 2012.

What Is Constrained Delegation?

Constrained delegation lets you limit the back-end services for which a front-end service can request tickets on behalf of another user. A common example of constrained delegation is the web-browser-to-IIS-to-SQL-Server scenario. In this scenario, a user navigates to a web-based reports server hosted on Microsoft IIS, which retrieves data using an authenticated connection to a Microsoft SQL Server system. The IIS server needs to authenticate to the SQL Server system on behalf of the user. Through Kerberos delegation, the IIS server (i.e., the front-end service) can request a service ticket for any service (i.e., back-end service)—not just SQL Server—on behalf of the user. This means that the IIS server can essentially authenticate on behalf of the user to SQL Server, a file share, or a web service. Using constrained delegation, you can limit the IIS server (the front end) so that it can authenticate the user only to SQL Server (the back end) and no other service or application.

Kerberos constrained delegation has been a part of the OS since Windows Server 2003. It requires you to configure an allow list of service principal names (SPNs) on user or computer objects in Active Directory (AD). You add the list of SPNs that represent the back-end services to which a front-end service is allowed to request tickets on behalf of the user to the ms-DS-Allowed-To-Delegate-To attribute of the principal under which the application or service on the front-end server runs. In the previous example, the front-end service is IIS and the back-end service is SQL Server. To constrain the delegation for IIS, you would add SPNs for the SQL Server instances running on the SQL Server system to the ms-DS-Allowed-To-Delegate-To attribute on the IIS computer account in AD—or the user account running the IIS application pool. This model constrains the front-end service to only request service tickets that are listed in the ms-DS-Allowed-To-Delegate-To attribute. The downside of this delegation model is that it relies heavily on SPNs.

Service Principal Names

SPNs are difficult to manage. Although they’re simple in concept, SPNs can cause a significant amount of frustration, stemming from unique constraints associated with using them.

Kerberos uses SPNs to identify the security principal responsible for running an application or service. This enables the Key Distribution Center (KDC) to encrypt tickets and keys with the correct hash so that the security principal (running the service or application) can decrypt the service ticket upon receiving the AP_REQ. This design requires that SPNs registered on security principals be unique for the AD forest. An SPN registered on multiple security principals will cause authentication to fail.

Constrained delegation appears to contradict the basic rule of registering a duplicate SPN; however, this is only in appearance. The KDC doesn’t look at the ms-DS-Allowed-To-Delegate-To attribute when trying to map an SPN to a security principal. Therefore, the unique SPN requirement is limited only to values in the servicePrincipalName attribute. To constrain the delegation of a service or application, you must list the service's SPNs on the security principal that runs the application on the front-end server.

Managing the number of SPNs, knowing when and where to register them, and avoiding duplicates is cumbersome. This makes constrained delegation difficult to implement, maintain, and troubleshoot.

Point of Delegation

Constrained delegation is a model that controls delegation on the front-end server. Most delegation models manage the point of delegation closest to the resource (i.e., on the back end). Implementing delegation on the front end removes control from the resource administrator and places it on the administrator of the front-end server (and application). This model prevents the resource administrator from managing access to the resource. The current model requires domain administrative privileges to modify the ms-DS-Allowed-To-Delegate-To attribute, thus adding more administrative overhead to the management of constrained delegation.

Scope of Delegation

Scope of delegation refers to the limit to which the delegation extends from the front-end server to the back-end server. The current constrained delegation model scope is limited to the domain, meaning that the security principal under which the application or service runs can forward constrained delegated tickets only to an application or service running under a security principal in the same domain. You can’t use constrained delegation across domain or forest trusts.

What Server 2012 Brings

Server 2012 introduces a new kind of Kerberos constrained delegation that addresses many of the shortcomings that exist with the previous constrained delegation model. The new implementation of constrained delegation removes the dependencies on SPNs for delegation configuration, removes the need for domain administrative privileges, enables the resource administrator to own the delegation experience, and increases the scope of delegation.

Constrained delegation in Server 2012 introduces the concept of controlling delegation of service tickets using a security descriptor rather than an allow list of SPNs. This change simplifies delegation by enabling the resource to determine which security principals are allowed to request tickets on behalf of another user.

Figure 1 shows a sample scenario. A server in Domain A runs an IIS application. The security principal under which the IIS application’s AppPool runs has the SPNs registered for the front-end service or application (HTTP/ These SPNs allow the user to authenticate to the front-end server using normal Kerberos authentication.


Figure 1: Constrained Delegation in Server 2012

The application retrieves data from a back-end server in Domain B running SQL Server. The security principal running the SQL Server service has the SPNs registered for SQL Server and SQL Server instances. Again, this configuration is normal to enable Kerberos authentication. The KDC in the domain hosting the security principal running SQL Server receives a Service-for-User-to-Proxy (S4U2Proxy) Ticket Granting Service (TGS) request from the IIS server on behalf of another user. The KDC reads the security descriptor stored in the msDS-AllowedToActOnBehalfOfOtherIdentity attribute on the security principal running the SQL Server service and performs an access check using the identity under which the IIS Application Pool runs. A successful access check allows the authentication process to continue, whereas an unsuccessful access check fails the authentication attempt.

Resource-based constrained delegation functions correctly regardless of domain functional level and number of domain controllers (DCs) running a version of Windows Server prior to Server 2012, provided you have at least one Server 2012 DC in the same domain as the front-end server and one Server 2012 DC in the domain hosting the back-end server. When the domain is a hybrid domain (both Server 2012 DCs and DCs running an earlier version of Windows Server), then Windows 8 and Windows 2012 computers ensure they use a Server 2012 DC to use resource-based constrained delegation by deliberately locating a Server 2012 DC.


The new implementation of Kerberos constrained delegation has the following requirements:

  • Server 2012 KDCs must reside in the front-end account domain
  • Server 2012 KDCs must reside in the back-end account domain
  • The front-end server must run Server 2012

Server 2012 KDCs are required for this feature because these are the only KDCs that know how to return referred S4U2Proxy requests and use the new msDS-AllowedToActOnBehalfOfOtherIdentity attribute on the service account. The front-end server requires Server 2012 because the version of Kerberos on these servers understands that it must chase S4U2Proxy referrals to trusted domains and forests.


You manage Server 2012 Kerberos constrained delegation using Windows PowerShell. Use the following Windows PowerShell cmdlets to manage constrained delegation. Typically, you'll want to use the Get-ADUser, Get-ADComputer, or Get-ADServiceAccount of the principal running the front-end service and pass that principal object as the argument value to the -PrincipalsAllowedToDelegateToAccount argument.

Set-ADComputer computerName -PrincipalsAllowedToDelegateToAccount principal1, principal2, ...
Set-ADUser userName -PrincipalsAllowedToDelegateToAccount principal1, principal2, ...
Set-ADServiceAccount serviceAccountName -PrincipalsAllowedToDelegateToAccount principal1, principal2, ...
Get-ADComputer computerName -Property PrincipalsAllowedToDelegateToAccount
Get-ADUser userName -Property PrincipalsAllowedToDelegateToAccount
Get-ADServiceAccount serviceName -Property PrincipalsAllowedToDelegateToAccount

Stay Tuned for More

This article identifies the challenges IT pros face when implementing Kerberos constrained delegation. Server 2012 provides a compelling answer to these problems by introducing resource-based Kerberos constrained delegation. In Part 2 of this series, I’ll provide a more in-depth analysis of how resource-based constrained delegation works and look at the flow of authentication that’s exchanged between computers running Server 2012.

Hide comments


  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.