First Peek at Web-Based Office

Microsoft Office Web Applications disappointing to say the least

Last week, Microsoft finally shipped a pre-release version of its long-overdue Office Web Applications to a small group of external testers. It's hard to overstate how disappointing this release is.

First, the so-called Technical Preview is several months late, as Microsoft originally promised to ship this release as far back as December 2008. Second, it's not widely available at all, and it's unclear who exactly Microsoft selected for this first preview. Third, only the consumer version is available for testing, so it's all happening via Windows Live.

And the final nail in the coffin--and this is bizarre given how much extra time Microsoft has allotted itself--is that web apps aren't feature complete. In fact, they're missing some very basic functionality in the Tech Preview form.

This is alarming because Office Web Applications is the beachhead for Microsoft's coming battle over the cloud computing future. Google and smaller companies most of us have never even heard of are busy building fully web-based productivity applications that may in some ways seem underpowered compared to traditional Office applications. But they're also specially attuned to the needs of the cloud computing model in ways that Office Web Applications are not. For example, with Google you can purchase additional storage and use web apps like Gmail, Google Calendar, and Google Docs offline.

Microsoft's approach says a lot about the company's core competencies—that is, its traditional desktop and server software. But it says even more about its current stance on its bread-and-butter Windows and Office products. And that stance is purely protectionist.

In other words, Microsoft has no interest in any consumer or business replacing traditional installs of the Office suite with Office Web Applications. Instead, it is positioning the Office Web Apps as a companion to traditional Office. And it is artificially limiting what these web-based solutions can do in order to ensure that remains the case.

This is a mistake. And it betrays a key weakness in Microsoft's strategy to compete with the Googles of the world in the next great market struggle.

Most problematic is that Microsoft actually has the tools it needs to win here. In fact, if it followed the traditional Office usage model, Office Web Apps would be so good that any competition it might face would be in name only. Imagine how dominant the Office suite would be online.

Instead, what we get is a minor subset of Office's full capabilities. Documents passed through the Web Apps retain their formatting, which is of course important, but many of the best features in Office--and indeed the best new features in Office 2010--can only be found on the PC desktop.

Microsoft has already innovated over many decades in Office. The next innovation should see this suite truly live up to the "Office Anywhere" mantra. Within reason, it should work as well on the web--and on mobile devices in addition to Windows Mobile--as it does on Windows PCs.

Oddly enough, this thinking is entirely in keeping with Microsoft's interoperability strategy, which we've discussed here previously in UPDATE. The company has little compunction to let Windows Mobile's competitors license Exchange ActiveSync. Well, let them have Office too. On the web. On the phone. Or on their PC.

That said, Office Web Applications isn't a total wash. If you're curious about what's working and what isn't, please see my write-up on the SuperSite for Windows.

Hide comments


  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.