Skip navigation
Tech’s Antitrust Showdown With Congress Opens With Six Measures

Tech’s Antitrust Showdown With Congress Opens With Six Measures

The House Judiciary Committee’s consideration of antitrust bills targeting big tech began Wednesday with bipartisan pledges to use legislation to break the hold that the largest companies have on the internet economy.

(Bloomberg) -- The House Judiciary Committee’s consideration of antitrust bills targeting big tech began Wednesday with bipartisan pledges to use legislation to break the hold that the largest companies have on the internet economy.

Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler cited the 16-month investigation that the panel’s antitrust subcommittee conducted last year, which accused Apple Inc., Facebook Inc., Inc. and Alphabet Inc.’s Google of anticompetitive behavior.

“Each bill is an essential part of a bipartisan plan to level the playing field for innovators, entrepreneurs and startups and to bring the benefits of increased innovation and choice to American consumers,” Nadler, a New York Democrat, said in his opening statement.

Last year’s investigation was led by antitrust subcommittee Chair David Cicilline and ranking Republican Ken Buck, whose partnership has built remarkable bipartisan support for the six measures before the committee. Although the bills may have support to make it through the Judiciary Committee, it’s not clear that all of them could pass the House. And the Senate presents an even bigger hurdle because most legislation needs at least 10 Republicans to become law.

Cicilline, a Rhode Island Democrat, described the bills as a “direct and measured response” to the subcommittee’s investigation. He said that many of the businesses they questioned during that probe described how they feel “trapped” by the four big tech companies.

“Over and over, words like fear, bullying, and hardship, came up in interviews,” Cicilline said. “App developers, through third party sellers and even large publishers reported being victims of predatory behavior.”

Internet ‘Oligarchs’

Buck, a conservative Republican from Colorado, said the committee’s legislative response represents “a scalpel, not a chainsaw, to deal with the most important aspects of antitrust reform.” He said giving more resources and support to the Federal Trade Commission and Justice Department would “give small businesses a fair shot against oligarchs like Jeff Bezos and Mark Zuckerberg.”

“These monopolists routinely use their gatekeeper power to crush competitors, harm innovation, distort and destroy the free market and silence conservatives,” Buck said.

Though the proposals that most threaten the companies are unlikely to become law as written, they show that lawmakers are intent on finding a way to curb the dominance of tech behemoths and preview how they’re seeking to strengthen antitrust enforcement.

There were some early signs of division among the panel’s Republicans. Ohio Representative Jim Jordan, the Judiciary Committee’s ranking Republican, said the bills under consideration wouldn’t address his main concern, what he describes as censorship of right-wing users and viewpoints, including former President Donald Trump.

“Big tech censors conservatives. These bills don’t fix that problem, they make it worse,” Jordan said. “They don’t break up big tech, they don’t stop censorship.”

The committee began with a bill to update merger filing fees, H.R. 3843, from Colorado Democrat Joe Neguse and Indiana Republican Victoria Spartz. The bill would give the Justice Department and the FTC more resources to bring antitrust cases. The Senate already passed a version of this measure earlier this month.

Also on the schedule for Wednesday:

  • H.R. 3460 would allow cases brought by state attorneys general to remain in the states where they were initially filed. This measure also has a companion bill in the Senate, giving it a better chance than some of the others to pass both chambers.
  • H.R. 3816, from Cicilline and Texas Republican Lance Gooden, would outlaw any practice that “advantages the covered platform operator’s own products, services, or lines of business over those of another business user.” This could limit how Apple presents its own music and messaging products on iPhones, since competitors like Spotify and Facebook’s WhatsApp depend on mobile phones to reach consumers.
  • H.R. 3825, from Gooden and Washington State Democrat Pramila Jayapal, would force the divestiture of entire lines of business, for example, requiring Amazon to break off its logistics services division from the online retailer.
  • H.R. 3826, from Buck and New York Democrat Hakeem Jeffries, would restrict acquisitions by the covered companies.
  • H.R. 3849, from Pennsylvania Democrat Mary Gay Scanlon and Utah Republican Burgess Owens, aims to make it easier for users to move their data, such as photos and contacts, to another service.

Industry groups supported by tech companies have said that these proposals would hurt innovation and U.S. competitiveness and destroy products like iMessage and Google Maps that people like and depend on. Amazon has said the bills would hurt hundreds of thousands of sellers, including small businesses, that rely on its platform to reach consumers.

Apple wrote to the Judiciary Committee on Tuesday outlining what it described as negative effects on consumer choice if the House bills were to force changes to the iPhone and App Store.

“Apple is concerned that current proposals would harm consumer privacy, device security, and innovation,” according to the letter. “We urge the Committee not to approve the proposed legislation in its current form.”

While 2021 returns vary widely for the big four in lawmakers’ sights, investors are hardly panicking over Congress’s intentions.

Google parent Alphabet and Facebook are both outperforming broader U.S. stock benchmarks, with year-to-date gains of 40% and 24% respectively. The underperformers are Amazon and Apple, up only 7.6% and 1%.

‘Monopoly Problem’

While the Senate Judiciary Committee’s antitrust panel has raised some of the same issues that the House bills seek to address, Chair Amy Klobuchar has taken a broader look at concentration across the economy beyond the tech sector. She introduced a proposal in February that focuses on updating existing antitrust statutes to make it easier for enforcement agencies to bring and win cases.

Klobuchar, a Minnesota Democrat, has said she’s willing to break that measure into smaller pieces that might have a better chance of getting enough bipartisan support to become law, but she hasn’t joined the House’s legislative focus on a small number of powerful tech companies.

The proposals are a good first step, according to Bill Baer, who led the Justice Department’s antitrust division under Obama. Baer said bringing antitrust cases can be a long and sometimes fruitless pursuit for enforcement agencies, and the House bills are an attempt to reverse decades of lax enforcement and decisions by conservative judges.

“What the legislation in the House recognizes, and legislation in the Senate as well, is that we do have a monopoly problem in the tech sector, that these markets seem to allow for development of and persistence of market power, with adverse effects on competition, on the consumer,” Baer said.

Hide comments


  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.