Some integration efforts are great ideas, but others are not sure bets. Such as the inventor who wanted to make carbonated vegetable drinks. Sure, the idea integrates the great nutrients of vegetable juices and the effervescence of sodas. But, in this case, 1 + 1 = 0.
I’m wondering if Microsoft’s newest language development idea, called LINQ (for the .Net Language Integrated Query), is a sure bet or not. LINQ was announced at Microsoft PDC (Professional Developer’s Conference) yesterday and was created by .Net grandfather, Anders Hejlesberg. LINQ is intended to solve the problem of how to integrate various sources of data into applications built with object-oriented programming models.
LINQ does this by adding new data-query capability to .Net languages. Now, this is not just relational databases, this applies to all forms of data such as XML documents from the VB.NET and C# code. You will then use the LINQ syntax for querying data rather than using SQL (the Structured Query Language).
Am I in favor of this direction? Well, there are two sides to this coin. Developers are going to love not having to learn new languages, and the additional debugging, troubleshooting, and performance tuning techniques for a whole new language. On the other hand, as an enterprise DBA, I don’t like it.
The silver lining in this cloud on the horizon is that it is far, far off on the horizon. LINQ probably won’t be here for a long time. It requires new work in both Visual Studio and SQL Server, and we all know how long the last iteration of those products took. Still, it’s something to think about and keep in mind.
For more details, see http://www.infoworld.com/article/05/09/14/HNfuturewithlinq_1.html?source=rss&url=http://www.infoworld.com/article/05/09/14/HNfuturewithlinq_1.html.
Let me know what you think. Is LINQ more bark than bite?
Cheers,
-Kevin
