Windows & .NET Magazine UPDATE, brought to you by Windows & .NET Magazine, the leading publication for IT professionals deploying Windows and related technologies.
http://www.winnetmag.com
Mark Minasi, senior contributing editor for Windows & .NET Magazine, provides insights into and analysis of today's hot Windows 2000 and .NET trends.
THIS ISSUE SPONSORED BY
Scalability WP
http://www.ibm.com/e-business/playtowin/n202
Free DOWNLOAD netsupport Remote Control Software
http://anon.doubleclick.speedera.net/anon.doubleclick/PentonMedia/rd020830.html
(below COMMENTARY)
SPONSOR: SCALABILITY WP
Learn real-world techniques for meeting the scalability demands of your e-business. The IBM white paper, "Design for Scalability," includes methodologies, statistics, and an analysis of common mistakes that can help you identify key issues in building for rapidly changing usage and workload patterns, along with meeting objectives for revenue and satisfaction. Also included is an analysis of which scalability techniques are best for which infrastructure components and how other companies have realized the benefits of using a variety of IBM hardware, software and service solutions. Visit us online to get your complimentary copy today at
http://www.ibm.com/e-business/playtowin/n202
August 30, 2002—In this special issue, Mark Minasi discusses anonymity on the Web and how it differs from privacy.
Nearly everyone I know (myself included) believes that privacy on the Internet is important. I've noticed, however, that until recently, I unconsciously classified "anonymity" as a kind of privacy and so considered it an automatic right of Internet users. But the more anonymity I see on the Internet, the less I like it. Perhaps we need to rethink the level of anonymity that the Internet offers.
Privacy on the Web
Privacy seems like a no-brainer when dealing with financial information or other data that someone might use to steal your identity. If I use a credit card to buy something from your Web site, I'm entitled to be certain that someone else won't intercept the information I submit from my Web browser to your Web server and that once the information reaches your Web server, it'll remain safe and secure. And if you buy something from my Web site and I ask for your mother's maiden name, your birth date, and what you called your favorite dog—all things that would make impersonating you online easier—I have a strong responsibility to ensure that the data is secure.
But what about privacy policies for other types of Web interactions? Suppose someone signs up to receive product information or to contribute to an online forum and in the process, reveals his or her name, job title, and email address: What responsibility does the Web site's owner have to keep that information private? The answer to that question is, by Internet custom, a matter for negotiation. Web sites typically post a privacy policy and, in the absence of one, don't (at least in the United States) have any real obligations to keep the user's information private. This approach seems fair to me: I go to your Web site seeking information; you want me to identify myself to some degree, and in return, you promise to use that personal information only in some restricted way. I look at the quantity and quality of the product information that you'll provide me and compare it with the amount of personal information that you want me to give you. Then, on the basis of that evaluation, I decide whether to sign up for your information, forum membership, or other service. (I find it infuriating when sites such as Amazon.com get away with simply changing their information-use policy, but that's another story, or rather another bit of legislation, that needs consideration.)
These e-commerce and membership/privacy policies seem fair to individuals using the Web, and our notions of Web privacy probably grew out of them. However, I think many Web sites are wrong to extend complete anonymity to their users—an anonymity that has become, in my opinion, a license to libel.
Anonymity and Civility
Visit Amazon.com, Buy.com, PriceGrabber.com, Epinions.com, or just about any other site that sells merchandise or points you to a retailer and you'll see online reviews and ratings of various products. Seeing both kisses and hisses about the same product is not unusual—as they say, if people agreed on everything, we wouldn't have horse races or ball games. Unfortunately, the savage and uncivil language that some people use to post negative reviews is also not unusual. Look closely, however, and you'll see that almost all the mudslingers are hiding behind some anonymous handle such as d00d432 or that most of the truly vicious Amazon.com reviews are from "A Reader in the US." Or try to follow a discussion in a newsgroup or threaded forum: The character-disparaging attacks are far more likely to come from users with a secret identity. In contrast, contributors who aren't worried about revealing their names usually provide discussion, comments, and reviews that are either positive or negative—but constructive.
Some people insist on complete anonymity because they fear that the subjects of their commentary might track them down and exact reprisals, whether deserved or not. I'm reminded of the scene in the end of the movie "Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back," in which Jay and Silent Bob use their newly acquired riches to track down and beat up everyone who's ever posted a negative comment about them on the Internet. Although the scene might have been a bit of wish fulfillment for director Kevin Smith, I'm having trouble envisioning the marketing manager for Minolta USA stalking and assaulting the guy who slammed the DiMAGE 7 on PriceGrabber.com.
I don't really blame the vitriol-slingers: In American media, the indignantly angry are portrayed as heroic, and our high schools certainly don't offer courses in civility or constructive criticism. Instead, I suggest that administrators who run Web sites that host forums and reviews require that their contributors identify themselves. I'm not suggesting censoring any conversation—just cutting out the masked men. Sure, this approach has problems. For instance, what constitutes "identify" and what about sites that cover topics where anonymity is necessary; no question, those are issues that would need discussion. But removing the anonymous from most online forums and review sites would, I think, lead to more information and less flaming. Ad hominem attacks and vicious public spleen-venting accomplish nothing and drive many people away from our online community.
I don't think asking contributors for a real name and perhaps country of origin, no more than that, is asking too much, particularly if it makes Internet conversation the property of us all, rather than the property of the loudest, angriest, and most uncivil. Of course, that's just my opinion. I suspect that some of you will have opinions (he said, with a wink), and I look forward to hearing them. As always, thanks for giving my thoughts a listen!
Mark Minasi, Senior Contributing Editor, Windows & .NET Magazine, [email protected]
SPONSOR: FREE DOWNLOAD NETSUPPORT REMOTE CONTROL SOFTWARE
Free DOWNLOAD NetSupport Remote Control Software
Perform remote support and management on multiple systems simultaneously over a LAN, WAN and the Internet with NetSupport Manager remote control software. A great SMS add-on. Click here for a free trial.
http://anon.doubleclick.speedera.net/anon.doubleclick/PentonMedia/rd020830.html
ANNOUNCEMENTS
(brought to you by Windows & .NET Magazine and its partners)
We need your opinion! Take our brief survey on managing Microsoft Exchange Server with third-party tools, and we'll automatically enter your name into a drawing for a Microsoft Xbox. Click here to start the survey!
http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?1ax4vkr1q8a55gj12hdhw5Ja
Make Sure to Pick up Our New eBook. "The Insider's Guide to IT Certification" eBook is hot off the presses and contains everything you need to know to help you save time and money while preparing for certification exams from Microsoft, Cisco Systems, and CompTIA and have a successful career in IT. Get your copy of the Insider's Guide today!
http://winnet.bookaisle.com/ebookcover.asp?ebookid=13475
SECURITY TECHNICAL WORKSHOPS FROM MICROSOFT AND NETIQ
Learn how to fight hackers during the Digital Crime Prevention Labs. These one-day workshops will deliver the ultimate experience in defending the enterprise. You'll team up to defend a LIVE network against a hacker. Register now!
http://www.netiq.com/events/seminars/digitalcrimeprevention/default.asp
MASTER WINDOWS NETWORKING WITH MARK MINASI
Learn network and desktop management from expert author/speaker Mark Minasi's books, audio seminars, and live classes. "Take George Carlin, make him techie, and clean up the language...you've got Minasi," a recent attendee says.
http://www.minasi.com
WHAT SYSTEMS AND NETWORK PROFESSIONALS NEED IN AUTOMATED MONITORING SOLUTIONS
Download this free technical white paper now from Windows & .NET Magazine's White Paper Central. Brought to you courtesy of MKS.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4483279;7402808;r?http://www.mkssoftware.com/eval/evalform.asp?product=document&distrib=WNET
CONTACT US
Here's how to reach us with your comments and questions:
- ABOUT THE COMMENTARY — [email protected]
- ABOUT THE NEWSLETTER IN GENERAL — [email protected]
(please mention the newsletter name in the subject line)
- TECHNICAL QUESTIONS — http://www.winnetmag.net/forums
- QUESTIONS ABOUT YOUR WINDOWS & .NET MAGAZINE UPDATE SUBSCRIPTION?
Customer Support — [email protected]
- WANT TO SPONSOR WINDOWS & .NET MAGAZINE UPDATE?
[email protected]
This email newsletter is brought to you by Windows & .NET Magazine, the leading publication for Windows professionals who want to learn more and perform better. Subscribe today.
http://www.winnetmag.com/sub.cfm?code=wswi201x1z
Receive the latest information about the Windows and .NET topics of your choice. Subscribe to our other FREE email newsletters.
http://www.winnetmag.net/email
